Your jurisdiction determines your “standing”, or your lack of “standing” – One must be aware of their ‘standing’.
1. Power of a court to adjudicate cases and issue orders.
2. Territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power. See, e.g. Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co. et al., 526 U.S. 574 (1999).
A man or woman who “acts” in “joinder” to a legally generated “artificial person” created and controlled by the state has “legal status” in the Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial Jurisdiction – the international “Law of the Sea”.
Legal Jurisdiction over a man/woman derives from consent to contract into legal fiction commerce. If there is no valid contract, there is no jurisdiction. The legal system pertains to the fictional theatre of “artificial persons”. When a man or woman consents to “act” in “joinder” to an “artificial person”, they cease to “live” in their “private capacity” “possessing unalienable rights and properties” and volunteer to “act” in a “public capacity” “granted revocable privileges and benefits”. Entering the legal system is by contract, or “legalisation”, usually via: “registration”, “licensing”, “certification”, “securitization”, or “general deposit”. In the legal fiction system, consent to contract can be presumed by “silent acquiescence”, unless a “man” or “woman” “rebuts the presumption” of “joinder” to an “artificial person”. All “artificial persons” are created legally without any inherent “productive capacity” and are therefore “debtors” by default and “limited liability” entities. They function as “transmitting utilities” to transmit “human energy” into commerce. Living people “energize” legal fiction commerce, knowingly, or unwittingly by deception, which is fraud.
A man or woman who “lives” naturally in their sovereign body possessing all their unalienable rights and powers has “lawful standing” in the Common Law Jurisdiction – the national “Law of the Land”.
Lawful Jurisdiction over man/woman derives from causing unreasonable harm to a living soul. If there is no human victim, there is no jurisdiction. The law pertains to the real world of living men and women. Lawful jurisdiction is subject to the “due process” of the Common Law whereby no crime is attributable to a man or woman unless they cause “intentional and measurable” harm to another man or woman, not reasonably caused by self defense. To prove a crime of harm there must be an “injured party” willing and able to “swear under oath” to the facts of that harm, “upon penalty of perjury” in a properly convened de jure “Court of Record” (Common Law court with a jury of one’s peers), or witness testimony equally-bound, or irrefutable evidence. In any detention/seizure/arrest, the accuser must have “probable cause” and/or a “reasonable suspicion” that the accused is committing, or is about to commit, a crime against a human victim. The accuser bears the burden of proof. Any forced detention/seizure/arrest without a human victim, by any Public Servant, is coercion, duress, treason, and a breach of their Oath and fiduciary duty as Trustee.
No legal or lawful matter can proceed without jurisdiction.
“Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven.” Hagens v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533.
“Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter.” See McNutt v. GMAC, 298 US 178. And Maxfield’s Lessee v. Levy, 4 US 308.
“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.
“There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215.
“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even on final determination.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 2nd 906 at 910.
Only you can challenge jurisdiction when you do not consent.
A simple jurisdictional challenge can quickly stop any legal matter:
“As the Director and Beneficiary of my legal person/corporation/trust, I give you 21 days to respond in writing providing proof of claim with evidence as to your legal or lawful jurisdiction over me, failing which you will become liable for any damages I may suffer.”
Memorise this powerful sentence, or keep a note of it.
You can say this to legal actors face-to-face, or write it on their legal “offer” document (any legal ticket, fee, penalty, tax, summons etc.). This removes their presumption of jurisdiction and places the burden of proof on the claimant where it belongs. You may need to do this three times, adding “I do not consent to proceed until your jurisdiction is proven with evidence.” Legal actors in commerce do not have legal or lawful jurisdiction so they will be evasive. When they fail to respond you can serve a notice of default for the record. You can also charge them for any damages you suffer, although do not expect them to be honourable.
An “administrative court” is a dispute resolution service for consenting parties. A summons is an invitation “summoning” or “calling” you to accept their dispute resolution service in Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction, so of course you have the right to decline their offer of contract.
Since jurisdiction is attached to the artificial legal “person” NAME, not the living man or woman, it is essential to correct the “mistake in the matter of the NAME”, as soon as possible after a summons is received. It is not necessary to go to their court. Indeed, by simply making an “appearance” in their court you will imply your belief in the “person”, which is guilty by default since it is a debtor and surety for the corporate national debt. If you “appear” in their court theatre they will PRESUME that you are “acting” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” under the court’s jurisdiction because YOU ARE THERE.
Maxim of Law:
Nihil habet forum ex scen.
The court has nothing to do with what is not before it.
Alternatively, the below Notice of Conditional Acceptance Re: Notice to Appear, can be sent to the Registrar of the Court to decline their offer. This usually cancels out the hearing, as there is no joinder and no proof of claim (it’s just an allegation or hearsay). The Registrar of the Court accepts and stamps court documents. You can require a copy by return post for your records. You can even go to the Registrar’s office, and if they refuse to make you a copy, you can take documents, copy them, then return the original(s):
“Avoid Their Courts Whenever Possible” ~ Judge “Dale”
American Courts [all administrative courts in Admiralty jurisdiction] are pseudo courts or fictions and simply are Corporate Administrative Offices designed to resemble Courts and all of their Judges are simply Executive Administrators designed to resemble Judges. The purpose of these pseudo Corporate Courts is only to settle contract disputes and since George Washington’s government was military in structure; if either party refuses to participate, these Courts cannot become involved and the dispute is dead in the water! My use of the term “dead in the water” is not a canard because these pseudo Courts are unconstitutional Courts of Admiralty, the International Law of the Sea!
The pseudo Judges of these pseudo Courts have NO powers without the Consent of both the Plaintiff and the Defendant. [AND] In every case the Judge must determine that he has Consent; Personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.
NOTE: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before they can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.
Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a portion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.
At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTH NAME] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly what you don’t want to do!
Remove your Birth Certificate and respond to him by stating: I am making a Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here and [hold up your Birth Certificate!] Then state the following:
As I understand this process Judge; the County Attorney [or] Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk and against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manual, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION. The Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST, then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE! So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter, with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!
NOTE: The Law of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too!
The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence! You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack confidence! Appearances [the pomp and majesty] of these pseudo Courts, is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation! If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride!
If the County Attorney begins to act too cocky with you, you can take the wind out of his sails by asking him to produce the 1040 for this case? If he denies the need to do such a thing, inform him that you will be taking care of that for him ASAP [as soon as possible]! He may move for a discharge at that point because you are a little too dangerous or smart! The last thing that Prosecutor wants is the IRS examining his files for the last seven years because he makes money on every conviction but he doesn’t pay TAXES on them as a Rule! He usually only declares the salary he receives.
The CITATION process can be handled much easier; through the mail. When a Police Officer issues you a CITATION, he is actually requesting you to CONTRACT with him! He is alleging that you violated a corporate regulation in writing, which you have accepted by signing and thus requires you to respond.
The Police Officer is instructed to explain that your signature is merely an acknowledgement that you received a copy of the CITATION but in actuality, your signature is notification to the Court and Judge that you have accepted or CONSENTED to this offer to CONTRACT, which also grants the Judge CONSENT; PERSONAM and SUBJECT MATTER jurisdiction over you and the case!
You can cancel that CONTRACT however by rescinding your CONSENT. The Federal Truth in Lending Act provides that any party to a CONTRACT may rescind his CONSENT, within three business days of entering into such a CONTRACT. So across the face of the CITATION you should print or type in large print, the following words:
I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS OFFER TO CONTRACTand
I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS.
Use blue ink [for admiralty] or purple ink [for royalty]. Admiralty is the Court and Royalty represents your Sovereignty. Either way is appropriate. Sign your signature underneath in blue or purple ink and in front of a Notary and under your signature type: Without prejudice, UCC 1-308. This is another way to declare that you may not be held responsible for this Contract pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code.
Serve Cancelled Citation back on the Clerk / Court, along with a Certificate of Service, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. This kills the CITATION; removes your CONSENT and removes the JURISDICTION of the Court, all at the same time. It really is that simple!
NOTE: A Certificate of Service is a letter that first identifies the Citation and then defines how and when you returned the document to the Court and is signed. If not denied, it becomes a truth in commerce by Tacit Procuration. Remember to keep a copy of everything, in case the Clerk attempts to trash your response, which certainly will not happen with a Certificate of Service or if it is mailed back by the Notary. The Notary is actually a Deputy Secretary of State and is more powerful than the Court Clerk!
SUMMONS and LAWSUITS:
The SUMMONS process, whether it is defined a Civil or Criminal Action, is once again an offer to CONTRACT, despite what words are used to command your appearance or response. It too can be cancelled just by following the same procedure as the CITATION process above. A million dollar lawsuit is no different than a CITATION and both can be cancelled! Hard to believe, isn’t it?
– Retired Judge and whistleblower, Judge “Dale”
Establishing Your Living Standing In Court
There are times when a living man or woman finds themselves in court before a Judge, either unwittingly, or by force, despite not giving their consent, and without having caused injury to any living man or woman.
Although an “administrative court” (no jury) is a “dispute resolution service for consenting parties” (living men and women who consent to “joinder” with dead legal “persons”), it is also a place of ancient Satanic magic. This is why living people are “summoned” as if to magically “appear” in court, becoming dead. Historically, a Judge wearing a black robe is a “High Priest of Ba’al” in the Temple of Ba’al, enforcing Babylonian Talmudic Law. The Judge, or the “Black Robed Devil”, requires an offering from those who “appear” in the Temple. The “Priest of Ba’al” makes a “judgement” upon the one who has given up their life, and in so doing the Priest delivers a curse (in ancient times death, in modern times debt etc), and the victim is sacrificed. The word “bailiff” derives from “ba’al”, because the “bailiff” is the servant of the “High Priest of Ba’al”. The Black’s Law Dictionary, in this context, is a book of black magic.
However, if you do not wish to be presumed dead, suffering “judgement”, you must establish your living rights, otherwise you will simply have no rights.
Maxim of Law:One who does not establish their rights has none.
To Establish Your Living Standing In Court:
1. “Your Honour, I am a living being. I humbly ask for remedy.”
At this point, if you have behaved with honour and respect, you may be dismissed. But the Judge is not out of options. He can leave the court and re-enter, now in a higher court, under Canon Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction. So you must establish your standing again, but in a higher manner:
2. “Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. Your Honour, I humbly ask for cure and maintenance.”
The Judge may be totally freaked out at this point. If he doesn’t dismiss you, and decides to leave again, he comes back as a Priest, so you are in a Temple now and the court is under Talmudic Law, which is very rare, indeed, because the Judge is at the limit of his authority and vulnerable. So you must establish your living standing appropriately by addressing him as follows:
3. “Your Honour, I wish to establish that I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows and we are sovereign and nothing stands between myself and the divine.”
That’s it. The game is over. You control the court and can dismiss the Judge.
1. UCC (power of fine)
2. ADMIRALTY MARITIME (power of jail)
3. TALMUDIC (power of death)
U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code)
The “administrative courts” are administering the international bankruptcy, and therefore they operate in the international Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the Law-of-the-Sea, and are bound by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC is a colorable version of Admiralty.
Colorable Admiralty jurisdiction is known as “Statutory” jurisdiction.
Color of Law: “Mere semblance of a legal right.” – State ex rel. West v Des Moines, 96 Iowa 521, 65 NW 818
In order for the UCC to be implemented there had to be a provision requiring it to be in harmony with the common law. This requirement may be found at UCC Section 1-103 which, when invoked along with UCC Section 1-207 [new UCC Section 1-308], represents a powerful method of protecting your natural rights from encroachment by the government.
The Recourse appears in the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-103.6, which says: “The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force, except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law.” (UCC 1-103.6)
This is the strategy we use in court. The Code recognizes the Common Law. If it did not recognize the Common Law, the government would have had to admit that the corporate State is bankrupt, and is completely owned by its creditors. But, it is not expedient to admit this, so the Code was written so as not to abolish the Common Law entirely. Therefore, if you have made a sufficient, timely, and explicit reservation of your rights at 1-207 [new 1-308], you may then insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law.
If the charge is a traffic ticket, you may demand that the court produce the injured person who has filed a verified complaint. If, for example, you were charged with failure to buckle your seat belt, you may ask the court: “Who was injured as a result of your failure to ‘buckle up’?” However, if the judge won’t listen to you and just moves ahead with the case, then you will want to read to him the last sentence of 103.6, which states: The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law section. Tell the judge, “Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my rights under the Uniform Commercial Code. I have a remedy, under the UCC, to reserve my rights under the Common Law. I have exercised the remedy, and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law. To be in harmony with the Common Law, you must come forth with the damaged party.”
If the judge insists on proceeding with the case, just act confused and ask this question: “Let me see if I understand, Your Honor, has this court made a legal determination that sections 1-207 [new 1-308] and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the system of law you are operating under, are not valid law before this court?”
Now the judge is in a jam! How can the court throw out one part of the Code and uphold another? If he answers, “yes”, then you say: “I put this court on notice that I am appealing your legal determination.” Of course, the higher court will uphold the Code on appeal. The judge knows this, so once again you have boxed him into a corner.
The Quick Four Sentence Method
This method, according to multiple sources, was used by a woman in Los Angeles at an initial appearance in an administrative court (no jury/no injured party) to close the “books” on the “charge”. When you close the case they leave you alone. The first sentence expressly declines consent (this prevents the presumption of consent); the second sentence declines the offer of contract (an administrative court is a dispute resolution service by contract); the third sentence declines to become surety (via the artificial legal person NAME debtor in the debt-money system); the fourth sentence demands a bond against harm (court officials hold insurance bonds which can be called upon to indemnify anyone they may damage).
First – “I do not consent to these proceedings.”
Second – “Your offer is not accepted.”
Third – “I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.”
Fourth – “I demand the bond be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.”
At this point, the Judge reportedly dismissed the case and told her to leave the court. Someone observing this method repeated it, and was also released. After the second case, the Judge told everyone to go home, and closed the court for the day, leaving the court.
If court officials expect someone to use this method, they will typically re-schedule the case to the end of the day so that others will not see this. Judges do not want this method known, and BAR attorneys will not and cannot do this for you. If you enter their court intending to do this, you must do it yourself as soon as possible. Do NOT let them distract and dissuade you because if you agree to engage in any issue they attempt to raise you are consenting to their jurisdiction, and you WILL lose. Keep it simple. Do not add anything. Say ONLY the four sentences. If necessary, repeat, repeat, repeat.
Memorize ALL four sentences, or keep a copy!