Public Servants

Public Servants serve the Private Sovereigns who, having founded a constitutional unincorporated government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

Your government is a “public institution” with “public servant” employees who serve in a “public capacity”. Whereas, the people who form governments are “private people” living in their “private capacity”.

Public Servants serve the Private People who, having instituted a freely-elected representative government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

All elected officials and/or employees of the public State are Public Servants, including peace officers.

Your Public Servants include all oath-bound Officers of the Law. Most frontline “Police Officers”, however, perform two roles:

As Peace Officers they uphold the law, discharging their impartial duties under Oath “according to law”, which is the de jure Common Law Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the Land”. They swear to “keep the peace”, by doing their best to keep people and their property safe from harm. They are protected by a Public Bond, having Limited liability. They have Common Law powers (Constitutional) delegated by the People.

As Policy Officers they enforce statutes, which prescribe the legal terms and conditions of contracts with penalties etc., in the de facto Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the Sea”. They do NOT swear an Oath to “enforce statutes” in commerce, and are NOT protected by a Public Bond, having Unlimited full commercial liability. They have Corporate powers (Contractual) which are subject to Consent.

Peace Officer = “Constabulary Powers” = Constitutional
Policy Officer = “Corporate Powers” = Contractual


Revenue gathering for Commonwealth of Australia INC. in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction is not part of the sworn duty of a “Peace Officer/Constable”. An Officer conducting legal fiction commerce in support of the private debt-money system of bondage can be described as a private mercenary abdicating their oath.

“Police Officers” enforcing statutes in legal fiction commerce have NO JURISDICTION over any living man or woman unless that man or woman consents to that jurisdiction.

All legal jurisdiction over a man or woman requires their consent, and so all presentments from of a “Police Officer” are a “service” offered by “consent”.

Reference Living in the Private Blog

The police cannot stop you, question you, detain you, arrest you, search you, or charge you, without your consent, if there is no victim. Ultimately, the “administrative courts” cannot fine you or imprison you without your consent. But if at any point you “understand” (stand under their authority), agree to anything, or give them the artificial legal “person” NAME, you are consenting.

THE TWO BASIC TYPES OF ENCOUNTERS:
1. Consensual, in which you are free to leave at any time.
2. Detention/Seizure/Arrest, in which you are held by “an assertion of authority”, or by physical restraint, against your will.

In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Peace Officer/Constable” MUST have “probable cause” and/or a “reasonable suspicion” that you are committing, or are about to commit, a CRIME against a victim. The accuser bears the burden of proof to reasonably establish your CRIME.

In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Police Officer” MUST establish that you are “acting” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” NAME created by the State and controlled by prescribed statutes. The Officer bears the burden of establishing your informed and voluntary CONSENT.

No “Police Officer” is vested with the Common Law power (Constabulary power)to randomly detain or arrest you for the purpose of asking questions.
“[Police Officers] have no power whatever to arrest or detain a citizen for the purpose of questioning him or of facilitating their investigations. It matters not at all whether the questioning or the investigation is for the purpose of enabling them to ascertain whether he is the person guilty of a crime known to have been committed or is for the purpose of enabling them to discover whether a crime has or has not been committed. If the police do so act in purported exercise of such a power, their conduct is not only destructive of civil liberties but it is unlawful.”
Regina v. Banner (1970) VR 240, at p 249, the Full Bench of the Northern Territory Supreme Court.

“It is an ancient principle of the Common Law that a person not under arrest has no obligation to stop for police, or answer their questions. And there is no statute that removes that right. The conferring of such a power on a police officer would be a substantial detraction from the fundamental freedoms which have been guaranteed to the citizen by the Common Law for centuries.”
Judge Stephen Kaye, Melbourne Supreme Court, 25 November 2011.

“There is no common law power vested in police giving them the unfettered right to stop or detain a person and seek identification details. Nor is s.59 of the (Road Safety) Act a statutory source of such power.”
Magistrate Duncan Reynolds, Melbourne, July 2013.

An Officer who stops you in the course of your lawful business, without your consent, or “articulable probable cause”, is assailing you.

DEALING WITH ASSAILANTS:
1. Identify your assailant, their motive and jurisdiction.
2. Require verification of a CRIME (no crime = no jurisdiction).
3. BE POLITE, STAY ON POINT.

You have the Right not to be “arbitrarily” stopped, detained or arrested [by chance, whim, or impulse]. There must be an “articulable” and “reasonable suspicion” that you are involved in a CRIME against a VICTIM, and a WITNESS [can be a “Peace Officer”] with first-hand knowledge and evidence who is willing to write an affidavit under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability, making the accusation of the crime. You have the Right not to answer questions. You have the Right not to provide government issued ID. You have the Right to ASK QUESTIONS.

To control people, the Police rely on:
“Ignorance of the Law is no excuse”

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2008/0072/latest/DLM1102205.html

The founding of a representative government by the People automatically forms a Trust in Common Law, with the People as Beneficiaries, and their Public Servants as Trustees. The Public Servants have a Fiduciary Duty to serve the Beneficiaries of the Trust.

It is the responsibility of the Private People to oversee their Trust, and their Public Servant employees, for the common good of their communities and nation.

The government of a sovereign nation is an unincorporated body politic, which enabled by the delegated power of the People, can create subordinate legal fiction governmental corporations, and non-governmental corporations, for the purpose of commerce.

Sovereign living people are in the Common Law jurisdiction – the national Law-of-the-Land (lawful), while legally generated corporate “artificial persons” created by the State are in the Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the international Law-of-the-Sea (legal).

The “Common Law” mirrors “Natural Law” inasmuch as the protection of life is paramount, because life is a sacred creation. “Natural Law” is a system of “right or justice” held to be common to all humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society.

Whereas the legal fiction system of commerce is simply an imaginary construct, using “artificial persons” as “transmitting utilities” to extract and exchange productive energy from the real world. Hence the Maxim of Law: Legality is not Reality.

Jurisdiction is critical because when a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they are subservient to the State which created it by “registration”. The State prescribes “revocable” “privileges” and “benefits” to its “persons”, whereas private men and women possess “unalienable” “rights” and “properties”.

Moreover, “artificial persons” and all corporations are created as debtors by default, having no creative human energy or innate productive capacity, and therefore they can be bankrupted. This is why your government has been incorporated and why you are using debt-money, instead of sovereign money issued debt-free by a sovereign unincorporated government.

When a nation, or community, surrenders its sovereign power to create money without debt or interest, a deadly economy is inevitable due to the cumulative toxic consequences of interest-bearing debt. Finally, the system is mathematically guaranteed to collapse, because the interest, which is not created, compounds exponentially, requiring ever more new debt to service existing debt.

There are no limits to the growth of debt, and yet all debt is sooner or later a future claim on Nature as the ultimate limited source of all wealth. Servicing debt requires extracting production at any cost beyond the limits to growth on our finite planet. The “growth imperative” to service endless debt causes, overall, a destructive economy.

Given the parasitic nature of debtism, it should be obvious why the Private People are not taught to uphold their living Common Law jurisdiction, which acknowledges their sovereign “rights already existing” antecedent to the State.

The sovereign People of any nation have a duty to oversee their governmental Public Servants, failing which the sovereign People, despite their inherent authority, will sooner or later suffer the consequences of their negligence, because history teaches us that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

When Private People wish to exercise their sovereign authority over their Public Servants, unincorporated and incorporated, they must have Common Law standing.

Every man or woman, and every community of Private People, can uphold the Common Law, declining consent if they deem it necessary to avoid harm or loss to any living soul, or to safe-guard their community, or to protect their living Earth upon which all people depend for life.

A private man or woman can rebut a presentment from a Public Servant, and hold them to account, by using a process of Conditional Acceptance.

Or, a community of Private People can rebut a decision, a plan, or a policy, of their Public Servants by holding a People’s Assembly in order to exercise their “home rule powers”.

PEACE OFFICERS

Your Public Servants include all oath-bound Officers of the Law. Most frontline “Police Officers”, however, perform two roles:

As Peace Officers they uphold the law, discharging their impartial duties under Oath “according to law”, which is the de jure Common Law Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the Land”. They swear to “keep the peace”, by doing their best to keep people and their property safe from harm. They are protected by a Public Bond, having Limited liability. They have Common Law powers (Constitutional) delegated by the People.

As Policy Officers they enforce statutes, which prescribe the legal terms and conditions of contracts with penalties etc., in the de facto Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the Sea”. They do NOT swear an Oath to “enforce statutes” in commerce, and are NOT protected by a Public Bond, having Unlimited full commercial liability. They have Corporate powers (Contractual) which are subject to Consent.

Peace Officer = “Constabulary Powers” = Constitutional
Policy Officer = “Corporate Powers” = Contractual
Revenue gathering for YOURNATION (INC.) in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction is not part of the sworn duty of a “Peace Officer/Constable”. An Officer conducting legal fiction commerce in support of the private debt-money system of bondage can be described as a private mercenary abdicating their Oath.

“Police Officers” enforcing statutes in legal fiction commerce have NO JURISDICTION over any living man or woman unless that man or woman consents to that jurisdiction.

All legal jurisdiction over a man or woman requires their consent, and so all presentments from of a “Police Officer” are a “service” offered by “consent”.

“It’s important for us to know what people think of our service – in New Zealand we police
by consent and cannot afford to lose the support of the people we serve.”
 (emphasis added)

The police cannot stop you, question you, detain you, arrest you, search you, or charge you, without your consent, if there is no victim. Ultimately, the “administrative courts” cannot fine you or imprison you without your consent. But if at any point you “understand” (stand under their authority), agree to anything, or give them the artificial legal “person” NAME, you are consenting.

THE TWO BASIC TYPES OF ENCOUNTERS:
1. Consensual, in which you are free to leave at any time.
2. Detention/Seizure/Arrest, in which you are held by “an assertion of authority”, or by physical restraint, against your will.

In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Peace Officer/Constable” MUST have “probable cause” and/or a “reasonable suspicion” that you are committing, or are about to commit, a CRIME against a victim. The accuser bears the burden of proof to reasonably establish your CRIME.

In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Police Officer” MUST establish that you are “acting” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” NAME created by the State and controlled by prescribed statutes. The Officer bears the burden of establishing your informed and voluntary CONSENT.

No “Police Officer” is vested with the Common Law power (Constabulary power)to randomly detain or arrest you for the purpose of asking questions.
“[Police Officers] have no power whatever to arrest or detain a citizen for the purpose of questioning him or of facilitating their investigations. It matters not at all whether the questioning or the investigation is for the purpose of enabling them to ascertain whether he is the person guilty of a crime known to have been committed or is for the purpose of enabling them to discover whether a crime has or has not been committed. If the police do so act in purported exercise of such a power, their conduct is not only destructive of civil liberties but it is unlawful.”
Regina v. Banner (1970) VR 240, at p 249, the Full Bench of the Northern Territory Supreme Court.

“It is an ancient principle of the Common Law that a person not under arrest has no obligation to stop for police, or answer their questions. And there is no statute that removes that right. The conferring of such a power on a police officer would be a substantial detraction from the fundamental freedoms which have been guaranteed to the citizen by the Common Law for centuries.”
Judge Stephen Kaye, Melbourne Supreme Court, 25 November 2011.

“There is no common law power vested in police giving them the unfettered right to stop or detain a person and seek identification details. Nor is s.59 of the (Road Safety) Act a statutory source of such power.”
Magistrate Duncan Reynolds, Melbourne, July 2013.

An Officer who stops you in the course of your lawful business, without your consent, or “articulable probable cause”, is assailing you.

DEALING WITH ASSAILANTS:
1. Identify your assailant, their motive and jurisdiction.
2. Require verification of a CRIME (no crime = no jurisdiction).
3. BE POLITE, STAY ON POINT.

You have the Right not to be “arbitrarily” stopped, detained or arrested [by chance, whim, or impulse]. There must be an “articulable” and “reasonable suspicion” that you are involved in a CRIME against a VICTIM, and a WITNESS [can be a “Peace Officer”] with first-hand knowledge and evidence who is willing to write an affidavit under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability, making the accusation of the crime. You have the Right not to answer questions. You have the Right not to provide government issued ID. You have the Right to ASK QUESTIONS.

See Rebut the Presumption

To control people, the Police rely on:
“Ignorance of the Law is no excuse”

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2008/0072/latest/DLM1102205.html